The first Lettera 22 I received. It is the red Italian one. Outwardly it looks the same before and after cleaning. |
One cannot (well, yes I could, but I need to plug one of Ted Munk's excellent manuals) start work on a Lettera 22 without the manual. |
When I bought the Lettera 22 the type bar rest pad was loose and laying in the machine. |
I cleaned all the old adhesive residue from the mounting channel and used printer's cement (rubber cement will work) to remount the leather pad. |
A bit out of place, but this is the pad before reinstalling it. |
I need practice to be able to use this keyboard whether or not I use the 2-finger method or not. It is much more difficult to use than I thought it would be. |
A bit of color shift from the LED lighting in my shop. This is the taupe Lettera 22 being readied for a cleaning. |
Reminds me of an SM 3 or SM4. The rubber mounting washers for the cover were all deteriorated. These are actually small rubber gaskets that I had plenty of from working on radios. |
Note again, to remove the cover the platen must be fully left as far as it will travel. The same to replace it. |
After cleaning the type slugs and blowing the dirt out of it. This typewriter typed great and did not require any other cleaning besides cleaning the very dirty type slugs. |
Not perfectly clean, but much cleaner than when I started to clean them. |
This one is now ready for next Saturday's Type-In. |
Here are the Universal and Clipper awaiting repair along with a script H3k I hope to finish for Saturday. |
Both of these are fun to use for what they are. I'm still learning, but I'll take my 35mm, medium, and large format cameras and real film over digital imaging for quality any day. |
I enjoyed this. More lengthy typecasts with lots of images are fun.
ReplyDeleteI once had three Olivetti L22s but they all had nagging escapement issues - it's buried deep in the machine, hard to access without removing the carriage.
I've been enjoying micro four thirds since 2008 and the first camera, the Panasonic G1. Just ordered an Intrepid 4x5 to augment my Speed Graphic, looking forward to its arrival from across the pond.
Thanks again for the post. Keep typing. The more you do, the better you get.
Joe,
DeleteThat Intrepid should be a fun camera to use. Closest I have to that is my old Eastman View-II although I do have a B & J 4x5 press camera that replaced my Speed Graphic.
L22's seem to be either super-snappy (rarely) or super-mooshy (usually). The one I have now is a bit of a basket case due to some ancient drop damage, but it's closer to snappy than mushy, so I continue to tinker with it. (:
ReplyDeleteHey, that's a nice tool case background for that sleek and shiny book! :D
also, congrats on the incoming job offer flood. It's sweet to have good choices :D
DeleteTed,
DeleteI really can't say I dislike the Letteras or that I like them. Kind of like a Valetine I used, unique.
It reminded of the Lettera 32 I had long ago...
ReplyDeleteI haver never owned a classic Underwood... The best machine I know is the Olympia SG 3... But I'd love to try an Underwood 5... Of course, after finding a functional one. xD
Joshua,
DeleteI hope you can find an Underwood. I think you'd like it. We all have our preferences though. I know some people who like other brands better than Underwood.
As far as I know, an Underwood 5 is at least 80 years old...
DeleteThe less ancient Underwoods I know look exactly like Olivetties. :(
I reckon you should take the red Italian job to the type-in Bill, it's snazzy 😀 How very cool re all the job offers, nice to be able to choose which one suits best. I can't imagine using film again, digital is too instantly convenient. Also still loving my Olympus OMD, so light compared to my old Pentax DSLR! Good luck at the type-in on the 3rd ☺
ReplyDeleteGrace,
DeleteThe red one is unique in several ways. I will probably take it.
One day I may like digital imaging as much as film photography, but I doubt it. I do really like my OMD. I never understood why a DSLR needs to weigh as much as my 4 x 5 view camera instead of a real 35mm SLR.
I wish I could use again my Kodak (Ektralite 500) camera. It uses a film very hard to find (110), although it has a very rare "automatic flash". And, although there were films for my camera, there's no places in my country (Mexico) where the film can be revealed. :(
Delete