Sorry for the usual typos. One day I'll not make any.
I generally don't choose soft cover notebooks or journals larger than pocket size, but I do like this one even better than the hardbound. You'll see why later.
Both this Webnotes as well as the Rhodiarama have a soft-touch to the texture of the covering on the cover, but this one leaves a lot to be desired of a quality cover.
This paper is nice to write upon with any pen I tried, even pencil. Very smooth. I meant shadowing as there was no bleed through for any pen used, even the sharpie.
As seen, very little shadowing.
0.0045 inches thick paper.
This is why I'll not be buying any more of these. The weird feel to the covers and they arrive damaged which says to me they will be easily damaged if carrying them around.
My trusty Barcelona made Olivetti Lettera 32. It has a nicer touch than my Italian made one.
As with typewriters all notebooks have their quirks. For Rhodia it is the covers on the Webnotes one. For the extra price it is not worth buying compared to the soft cover Rhodiarama. Both are casebound which makes them a good choice, and the Clairefontaine paper is hard to beat.
Both notebooks lay nice and flat and have ruled pages with line spacing of about 7mm. There are plenty of choices from Rhodia, plain paper, dots, lined, and quad ruled.
There are also plenty of sizes from pocket to large and assortment of binding styles. Overall a very nice product, and much better for the price than Moleskine.
The richness of the cloth covering makes these journals look more expensive than they are. There is a disadvantage to cloth though; dirt.
My 4B needs a platen and feed rollers. The ribbon feed was acting-up today also. I guess it works fine for being 93 years old.
I started, and continue, to leave the ink test pages as they scan. I do not edit or scale them so sometimes like here, on this page they look smaller than the covers, but once clicked open to a full size scan. Feathering? What feathering. A bit at the M in My, but I have not found any ink to feather.
I was completely amazed at the tiny bit of shadowing with this paper. It is the best paper I found. There is a reason I did not like Leuchtturm1917 beside being higher priced than many notebooks; it was this notebook and its paper. It is a bit smaller than the Leuchtturm1917, but for the price I'll use these for fountain pen. Pages are not prenumbered. That has never been a notebook killer for me since I have been numbering pages manually since high school.
This just happened to be the center of a signature. I left it here because I thought the pages might be perforated. They are not, but I do not know what may have caused the mark. These are the only 2 pages I found with the mark along the inside.
I like to measure the pages because of the confusion of vellum vs text vs book paper sheet weights. This is 100 gsm paper and measures (I could feel it as soon as I opened the notebook) a whopping .0057 inches thick!
If I am not mistaken even Clairefontaine paper is not this thick. I'll find out because I have one on order. I've never used one of their notebooks, and there are so many different styles I did not know what to pick. You'll see it in a future post.
Lines are spaced about 1mm wider than the other notebooks: 7mm vs 6mm
This company does not hide the place of manufacture.
This typewriter has one of the best feels compared to all of my typewriters, even Underwood. Perhaps because I grew up with a very similar one that was made about 1929 or 1930, and it is still in the family. Thanks to Richard Polt this one now rings its bell at the end of the line.
I really liked the journal in the center from Greenroom in Taiwan, but they no longer manufacture it. It is a bit larger than A5 (same size as the Leuchtturm1917), and the lines are wide spaced.
Unless the price goes up, I'll be using more of these. Even if the price goes up, as long as it is not much more than $10.00 I'll still use these for fountain pen.
The only thing that shadows is a Sharpie. I thought of that after I posted. I tried a sharpie and it does ghost, but it does not bleed like with thinner paper.
I don't really know why, but I quit using these. Maybe because I could not find them locally. I originally used these and Piccadilly for almost everything, plain old journalling, ham radio, work, travel, and in my garage. I liked to get a new one of these and a matching pocket size every time I went on a trip, especially a business trip since they have a business executive look. Since I was in Engineering I liked to have something nicer than a steno pad which I used to use for general notes.
I never knew of this company until I came to Kalamazoo. Here's a link to more information.
Very little feathering if any.
Ghosting is about the same as Piccadilly, but I could not find any bleed through on the page under this one, even with the fine nib Phileas.
Measures .00039" which makes it 20# or 75gsm. Those are typically .004 inches thick.
Typecast courtesy of my 1969 Olympia SM9 with Professional Elite typeface.
Matching A5 and pocket size. The big one has 240 pages and the small one has 192. Both are Smyth sewn and lay flat, have marker ribbons and elastic closures as well as a pocket on the inside rear cover. Very nice notebooks for the price. I've found the small one as cheap as $3 something and the large one for around $5.00 when they are on special prices.
I think I purchased this one in 2016 when we were traveling for my job interviews since most of the notes are of our travels and my thoughts on various employers.
There is still about 75% of the book unused. I will keep it for our next trip. I never used the pocket one.
I buy notebooks based on price and quality. Many times I will choose a cheaper price over a more expensive notebook even if the more expensive is better quality. I go for practical and utility more than fancy.
If there is bleed through on a notebook I use it with pencil and move on to a different brand when it is time for a new one. I prefer those made in the USA or Europe, but they are getting harder to find or more expensive or both.
What amazes me is that many others on the Fountain Pen Network also find they like the less expensive notebooks over expensive ones if they work with a fountain pen. The general criteria seem to be minimal to no feathering and no bleed through.
I found these notebooks during a recent visit to Wal-Mart. I think they were 97 cents for a shrink wrapped pack of 3. Much more economical than others, and with these I do not care if I see what I wrote on the back of the page. They do not bleed nor feather. So for the price I do not mind only being able to use one side of the page. Can't say the same for my Moleskine.
I only have pens with fine or medium nibs so I could not test a broad nib.
The paper is not a smooth as some of my other notebooks, but none of the nibs stubbed or scratched. There is a bit of friction though with the paper in these books and that resistance can be felt while writing. There were not tell-tale signs of ink on the next clean page.
